← Back to Battle Mode
GitHub Actions
Continuous Integration
Jenkins
Continuous Integration
GitHub Actions vs Jenkins 2026
Last updated: April 4, 2026
Quick Verdict
GitHub Actions has a higher overall rating (4.6 vs 4.2), indicating stronger user satisfaction. Pricing is comparable. Both are strong options in the Continuous Integration category. Choose based on your specific needs, team size, and feature priorities.
GitHub Actions
Starting Price
$0/mo
Free Tier
Available
Overall Rating
4.6/ 5.0
Integrations
5000
Mobile App
No
Jenkins
Starting Price
$0/mo
Free Tier
Available
Overall Rating
4.2/ 5.0
Integrations
1800
Mobile App
No
Feature Comparison
| Feature | GitHub Actions | Jenkins |
|---|---|---|
| build minutes | 2000 | unlimited |
| parallelism | ||
| docker support | ||
| caching | ||
| orbs | actions_marketplace | |
| workflows | ||
| insights | via_plugins | |
| arm support |
Best For
GitHub Actions
- Teams already using GitHub
- Open-source projects (unlimited minutes)
- Organizations wanting tight GitHub integration
Jenkins
- Teams wanting self-hosted CI/CD
- Organizations with complex custom needs
- Enterprises with strict data control requirements
Limitations
GitHub Actions
- Limited to GitHub repositories
- Minutes can run out quickly for large projects
- Less mature than Jenkins for complex pipelines
Jenkins
- Requires self-hosting and maintenance
- Steep learning curve
- Plugin ecosystem can be overwhelming